From the English-language website of Golden Dawn

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 07 October 2013 23:11.

For those with concerns about the survival of Golden Dawn, a comment which appeared today on the party’s American website might offer some considerable encouragement.  The opinion piece to which it was appended concerned an independent poll of 43,000 Greeks in which GD attracted 18.9% support and ran all but Syriza into the dust:

Syriza 29.7%
Golden Dawn 18.9%
New Democracy 18%
PASOK 8.7%
KKE 6.6%
Independent Greeks 5%
Democratic Left 3%

But one commenter named Sebastian offered an uplifting and more detailed appraisal which I thought deserved a wider audience:

This is even more meaningful than the numbers themselves. Do not forget Golden Dawn is under a systematic barrage of anti-propaganda, lies and misinformation both nationally and internationaly. Their leader is in jail and there’s a quango “judicial process” on the books against the party. A lot of Greeks, and even more non-Greeks are only getting distorted, lying info about GD.

Yet, YET! Despite all of this, factors that would seem like unsurmountable odds for any political force, GD is coming down on 2nd place.

Imagine for one moment…if Golden Dawn was allowed to compete on the public political arena on equal terms, under a just, fair and unbiased media intent just on reporting facts as they are, rather than being tools of the current system.

Does *anyone* here doubt Golden Dawn would be number 1? And by how many vantage points?

Please realize the true importance of this, and what it means for other European nations that do not yet have a visible nationalistic movement. We in the West live in the most well-organized, well-funded, technological advanced form of soft Orwellian tyranny the planet has ever seen. Every great tyrant and oppressor in human history would foam at the mouth.

Yet, a group of Greek nationalists, faced with these behemoths, are making them quiver in fear and winning against them, even when the rules of the game are changed to stack the play-board against them.

The desperation of the system, both the Greek one and the European Superstate is so obvious, so visible and palpable you can’t help but smile upon seeing it.

I think we are witnessing the Crossing of the Rubicon. As of now there is no turning back, GD is here to stay and is growing. The system can not destroy the party with destroying the tattered illusion of legitimacy it still clings to. Even if the enemy was to hunt all GD member and supporter and vaporize them, the ideals would remain. But “democracy” would have eaten itself and the backlash could be even a civil war. The mask of “liberal democracv”, long rotten and cracked, is falling away as we speak and showing the BEAST that lurks underneath. Even some acolytes of the system, not the evil malicious ones but the duped, useful idiot stooges that have been indoctrinated to believe deeply in the lies, are coming out in condemnation of their Lords & Masters shoving aside their holy “democratic” ideals for expediency and for holding on to power like hungry leeches.

We live in a political paradox that can not last forever and will not last that much longer. “Tyrannos” now rule a system of “Dēmokratia”, the forces inherent in the system pull each other apart, the center cannot hold, the whole edifice is beginning to collapse. According to the current brainwashing propaganda, repeated and crammed into our Western heads for the earliest age, the foundational stone of the “great” system we call “Democracy” is that when the Dēmos decides the rulers have to concede their Krateō to someone else, it will be so. The leader needs permission to rule and rules only by consent.

But our “leaders” are just stooges to moneyed interests and outside aliens. They are simply puppets addicted to money, to power, to prestige, to their own egos and to the ability of telling others what to do (and to sex and drugs too more often than not).

These creatures, if they had enough humanity to be considered human, could concede gracefully and step down from their positions when it is clear their subjects do not want them. In their own manner they fought the good fight, they lorded it over for many decades but now their time has run its course. Just like the God-Kings of old, the medieval Feudal Lords and the post-renaissance Absolute Monarchs they are now obsolete. They are no longer needed. They are no longer wanted. They stand now only as a flimsy dam against the marching tide of history.

They know it.

We know it.

But they will not concede. They will not give up gracefully. They will not accept Fate.

They will cling, by hook and crook, to their power and money. They will latch on to the corridors and seats of political power even if it leads to their nations being ripped apart and their people suffering. They will fluster and buster and spout and foam with faux righteous indignation at their adversaries and at what is coming and is right, fair, just and needed. They will break each and every rule, law and ideal they pretended to hold dear. They will order their hounds, who by then will be reduced in number, to be unleashed to crack down on the populace to force them into obedience when all arguments fail (because there was never nothing to argument about in the first place) and only brute force remains.

King Louis XIV of France had the words “Ultima Ratio Regum” (last argument of kings) inscribed upon the canons of his army. Political power is force, it is directed violence and the threat of aggression against those that do not follow the rules.

They all know it.

We all know it.

And Gold Dawn knows it.

And *that* is why the kings of our current age will begin to fall. Because despite all their efforts, all their propaganda, and their cultural marxism, all their post-modern, anti-human and anti-Folk ideas they have foisted upon the brains of several generations of European children the Man of the West is still here, and my oh my he is really pissed off! He follows rules and laws, but demands they are fair, legitimate, just and sensible; He is honorable but he is not naive; He respects rightful authority but he is not and will never be a slave; He detests senseless violence and destruction but he is not afraid to fight if called upon; He is gifted with deep patience, almost self-mortification even, but when a certain line is crossed his full fury begins to be unleashed; and when that happens the consequences make the world quiver and drain the blood from the faces of the enemy. Like a mountainous giant he is ponderous to rise, and ignores or accepts many minor bards and darts…but beware! For when He is fully risen and strides the lands, the Earth trembles.

To put it succinctly, the system had deluded itself into to thinking the Man of the West had no fight left in him. Now as he rises his fist in righteous anger, knowing his enemy and driven by relentless purpose; they *fear* him.

Oh…how they do fear him. And what joy it is to witness their dread!

Thus this supported in Iberia, says from the depths of his heart:

Νίκη για την Χρυσή Αυγή!

Victory to Golden Dawn!

May they be the inspiration for other Europeans to follow!

 


Distinguishing Majorityrights

Posted by DanielS on Friday, 04 October 2013 09:10.

Proposing A Pan White/European National Separatist Platform

Along with other distinctions of Majority Rights

14Logo

READ MORE...


The best they’ve got

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 02 October 2013 05:17.

The pay-wall at the Daily Telegraph has been oddly ineffective at gating off journalistic output, and the site continues to witness a relentless growth in truth-speaking.  Likewise, the cowardly closing of the comment facility of recent “diversity news” stories has not helped the DT editors.  The commenting heat has just been turned up on other articles, sometimes with little or no substantive connection to The Great Issue.  Clear your cookies if necessary and browse through the comments here.  Then have a look at them here, on a thread of an article to the most censored of recent DT subject matter.  The DT editors cannot win.  The flood-tide cannot be held back.

Personally, I am still devoting an inordinate amount of time to work on the DT threads, employing a variety of user-names to confuse the enemy.  They, meanwhile, are still putting up a very poor show, and have not thought of a means by which they may respond to our questions.  Generally, they avoid prolonged confrontation.  Even obviously convinced anti-racists skip away once their initial smear-tactic has been challenged - they’ve learned not to hang around while their moral worth is investigated.  It is clear now that the most tenacious and (self-evidently) committed anti-white commenters are those with non-white family members.  Their very defensive worldview is that genetic change to our people now is just the same as genetic change in the ancient world.  Wherever the Roman legions went, or Angles, Saxons and Normans, modern Africa and Asia may go likewise.  In essence, our people don’t exist except as a capacious bag into which any gene from anywhere can be stuffed without implications for who and what we are.  There is nothing to defend.

Yesterday, for example, I was informed here that:

Celts, Angles, Saxons, Danes, Normans…
To say nothing of the diaspora established here previously under the Roman empire and countless waves of immigration since.
Nationality is a river, not a pond.

In response I put up a couple of links to gene studies of the British population and said this:

READ MORE...


Can violence come?

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 30 September 2013 14:12.

As has happened with every such event in the past, I experienced a deep disquiet when the news of the Washington Navy Yard shootings hit the wires on September 16th.  Yes, a large military base close to the seat of American government seemed just as likely a target for the usual Moslem suspects as the Boston Marathon, and in the event it was a politically irrelevant black psycho.  But what if it had been a white man with a private arsenal and the regulation “links to white supremacist groups”?  What if some disturbed half-wit had hit out for the cause at the cost of a dozen completely innocent lives?

Obviously, the implications for WN would have been serious and harmful.  Yet more moral obstacles to its appointment with history would have been piled up.  Yet more scrutiny from the security state would be brought to bear.  Yet more certain would be the path of dispossession and marginalisation which our people are treading.

But what if we turn the “what if” question around?  What if strikes against the Establishment were systematic and serial.  What if they were embedded in the context of a violent revolutionary or “urban guerilla” struggle, and did not generate the same revulsion and alienation in the popular mind, or a least a significant part of it?

In essence, what are the conditions under which extra-legal action in the people’s cause engenders enough popular moral, financial, and logistical support to maintain the prosecution of military objectives over a period of decades, if necessary?

Putting aside the problem of how such action could be organised and executed in the modern security state when nationalism is so controlled and weak, which others have addressed, I think it is interesting to look at some of the structural constraints which operate in European and North American societies.

READ MORE...


On prescriptive ontologies – Part One, Judaism and Christianity

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 09 September 2013 02:40.

I’ve always been a bit of a petrol-head, and I thought I would write something about motoring.

A short while ago I came across an arresting photograph of a 1940’s Dodge Delivery Panel Van sitting sphinx-like in some late-spring North American field.  Time and the irresistible will of Nature had turned it into an inverted flower-pot.  It invited interpretation (some of which could even turn out to be relevant to Daniel’s recent exploration of new religious potentials, you never know).

Discounting the usual romantic allusions to decay and the fragility of Man’s design, what I saw there is a statement about mediation.  At the most obvious level, the image could be taken to represent the will of Nature to establish herself and remain established in a world of constant disorganisation, pushing through all obstruction, all negation, but having to be opportunistic, having to adapt to do so.  As such, it is a figure for all that we can say for sure – that is, free of religious creation myths and other speculative theories - about Source and subsistence.

READ MORE...


Its Lister or Bowery

Posted by James Bowery on Saturday, 07 September 2013 18:34.

Graham Lister’s incessant invective against me here at MR requires some sort of resolution:

Posted by Graham_Lister on September 06, 2013, 02:00 PM | #

Authentic phenotypes that allow the “Holy Spirit” to be expressed.

Really?

Gee whiz that’s a new one for the biology textbooks.

Perhaps Mr. Bowery might write up a Princeton monograph on the subject?

And just where are we on the Bowery express from Crazyville to Loony Town?

Is it any wonder that even semi-serious people don’t seem to want to engage at MR?

Unbounded fuckwittery is not attractive, nor interesting, in anyway whatsoever.

These are not the words of a man with whom compromise is feasible.  There is no basis upon which we can “agree to disagree”.  He is persistent in accusing me of having an important, perhaps even dominant, deleterious effect on MR.  I could very well make the case that Lister’s persistent attacks are rendering the environment of MR repulsive to “semi-serious people”.  It certainly seems to be making MR repulsive to me and although Lister would certainly deny that I am, at best, “semi-serious”, my own perception is that I am indeed very serious and that I no longer wish to cast my pearls before such swine.

Therefore this will be my parting message to MR until such time as I have observed Lister to be absent for an extended period of time.

The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) Lab may not produce a Princeton Monograph, but it has produced work that requires serious philosophical inquiry:

There are few people in the world who have sacrificed more in attempting to directly address the bankruptcy of scientific theory reflected in the frustration of the Princeton researchers in the above video.  My own work includes obtaining funds from HP to continue work done by Paul Allen’s erstwhile think tank “Interval Research”, to correct foundational mathematics of the empirical world pursued by Russell and Whitehead in Volume IV of Principia Mathematica.  That remedial work on Volume IV was directed toward a quantitative theory of relations that dealt with casting much of quantum mechanics and the science of so-called “paranormal” phenomena as a branch of mereology—Lister’s supposed, according to GW, primary area of potential contribution to “the ontology project”.

My contention here is that this area of inquiry has been relentlessly repressed from two opposing directions by Jewish movements, one in the religious realm in the form, primarily but not exclusively, of so-called “Christianity”, and the other direction from the Jewish-dominated “Skeptics” who are the shock troops of post-Manhattan Project big science and the academy.  These opposing movements work, in concert with the myth-making machine of Hollywood (aka “Dreamworks” as the founding Jews of that company call it) to mold collective consciousness in a way that alienates Euroman from his authentic self and does so not just with ‘mass psychology” but with the manipulation of “mass consciousness” and attendant paranormal “miracles”. 

This area of knowledge is a cornerstone of Jewish power throughout the ages and we can expect that the state of their knowledge is, at least as practical folklore, vastly superior to anything have been able to achieve in the area.  This explains the virtual panic migration of east European Jews from within a relatively small geographic area, across Europe, across the Atlantic and across North America to Hollywood where they established “An Empire of Their Ownvery shortly after Edison’s invention became known.

We are dealing with armaments so advanced that they make our piddling efforts with “The Ontology Project” look like flint blades against a nuclear arsenal.  So long as that project is significantly affected by rascals such as Lister, it will remain in the stone age.


Interview With Craig Cobb Midst the Media Frenzy

Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 01:20.

This interview was conducted midst an SPLC-triggered media frenzy. Immediately after completing this interview, the New York Times reporters showed up at the Leith, North Dakota residence of Craig Cobb—declared one of the most dangerous men in the US by the SPLC’s “Hate Watch”. Listen for the true story behind the frenzied article that will soon appear in the New York Times, and get an idea of Craig Cobb, the man—not the mythic monster.

UPDATE 5: CNN called Cobb asking him for a short statement of his motive for buying up lots in Leith, ND.  This statement was to appear on CNN in some form—Cobb mentioned their ticker.  He asked me for my suggestion and I came up with this:

It is supremacist for the government to test its social theories on unwilling human subjects.  I am trying to find a refuge for people who agree with my social theories.

When CNN called him back for his answer, he decided to go with my suggestion.  At this point CNN told Cobb that the message would appear at 7:15pm EDT.

The message did not appear on the news ticker at 7:15pm nor at any time during the next 20 minutes.

UPDATE 4: Click this link then click “Recommend” to promote the interview with NYT readership.

UPDATE 3: The New York Times story broke and the comments couldn’t stand in starker contrast to those made on the Drudge-linked story (see Update 2).  The comments to the Drudge-linked story are not only sympathetic to someone attempting to set up a protected area, but there is significant mention of hypocrisy.  There are two “publics” here one adhering to old media and the other to new media.  An additional note:  None of the North Dakota news sites carrying this story, and there are several, allow comments from the public.

UPDATE 2:  Drudge is running with the AP story.  If you want to have a high impact for almost no labor or time, just click this link and vote my comment up.

UPDATE:  The Associate Press story was just carried by ABC at their website.  My comment on the AP story there:

jabowery • a few seconds ago
This sentence in the article is false: “He declines to talk about his upbringing and gives no indication as to why he adopted his supremacist platform.”

Indeed I just posted a comment here that linked to an hour and a half interview that was mostly about his upbringing and development of his beliefs, and it was censored.

Do you people have no shame?

 


MR Interview With Craig Cobb Midst the Media Frenzy

Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 01:07.

This interview was conducted midst an SPLC-triggered media frenzy. Immediately after completing this interview, the New York Times reporters showed up at the Leith, North Dakota residence of Craig Cobb -- declared one of the most dangerous men in the US by the SPLC's "Hate Watch". Listen for the true story behind the frenzied article that will soon appear in the New York Times, and get an idea of Craig Cobb, the man -- not the mythic monster.

Download Audio SHA-1 Checksum Flash Player


Page 81 of 338 | First Page | Previous Page |  [ 79 ]   [ 80 ]   [ 81 ]   [ 82 ]   [ 83 ]  | Next Page | Last Page

Venus

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Al Ross commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Mon, 05 Feb 2024 03:14. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Sun, 04 Feb 2024 23:30. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Sun, 04 Feb 2024 00:06. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Sat, 03 Feb 2024 16:44. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Sat, 03 Feb 2024 03:26. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Fri, 02 Feb 2024 11:31. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Fri, 02 Feb 2024 09:34. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism' on Thu, 01 Feb 2024 21:00. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sat, 27 Jan 2024 22:52. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sat, 27 Jan 2024 04:35. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sat, 27 Jan 2024 04:00. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:44. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:12. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:03. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Milleniyule 2023' on Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:05. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:20. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Milleniyule 2023' on Mon, 22 Jan 2024 02:55. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Thu, 18 Jan 2024 23:38. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Thu, 18 Jan 2024 23:34. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:19. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:28. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:49. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:16. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Tue, 16 Jan 2024 05:22. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Tue, 16 Jan 2024 05:18. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Milleniyule 2023' on Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:52. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sat, 06 Jan 2024 23:40. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sat, 06 Jan 2024 17:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sat, 06 Jan 2024 13:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sat, 06 Jan 2024 12:15. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sat, 06 Jan 2024 05:39. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:48. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:38. (View)

Majorityrights shield

Sovereignty badge